This article focuses on David Lewis’s theory of causation. The author provides helpful clarity regarding the difference between material and counterfactual conditions, the distinction between causal dependence and causation, and the nature of possible world theories in general. Although it is found that Lewis does not fall victim to the problems of metaphysical impossibility or preemption, his theory still relies too much on mere intuition. Lewis’ solution is not very convincing when it comes to the slippery issue of causation.
"Possible Worlds and Counterfactuals: Critique and Commentary on Complicating Causation,"
Episteme: Vol. 19, Article 4.
Available at: https://digitalcommons.denison.edu/episteme/vol19/iss1/4